What's wrong with this picture? Apologies if the cut is wonky; for some reason this embedded as a table and I'm too annoyed to figure it out.
( Cut; click on image for bigger )Thanks, Fringe S2 DVDs; I thought there was no way you could make me unhappy.
( Cut; click on image for bigger )Thanks, Fringe S2 DVDs; I thought there was no way you could make me unhappy.
In lieu of a commentary track, I thought I'd post parts of the emails
mustangsally78 and I exchanged soon after she proposed what would become Iolokus. Sadly, I don't have the initial emails, only my replies. At least I quoted a lot. Herewith, portions of the correspondence labeled "As Sure as Eggs Is Eggs," December 1997. Original summary by MS is black. MS's replies to me are in blue. RT is in red. (I'm Heather Chandler!) I think there's interesting stuff here, about the false starts and surprises of writing, collaboration, feminism and reproduction, and (for
cathexys) intertextuality, both with fannish and nonfannish texts.
( we were writers once, and young )
( we were writers once, and young )
Tags:
From Publisher's Weekly, on Naomi Wolf's new book: "Forget what you think renowned anti-patriarchal social critic Wolf (The Beauty Myth) always writes—this book has nothing to do with academia, politics or even feminism." So what's it about, you ask?
Her father and his creativity.
Because what could a father who encourages his daughter to set her creativity free possibly have to do with her feminism?
Her father and his creativity.
Because what could a father who encourages his daughter to set her creativity free possibly have to do with her feminism?
.