So, I (1) felt very much that a boundary had been violated in the early minutes, but because that’s how we must make them feel, I deemed it a fair cop, if not fun for me; (2) intellectually thought the episode was fantastic, saying neat things about characters/authors/free will/destiny, and also addressing the audience with what was really more sympathy than I expected, except that I didn’t want to be addressed; and (3) wanted my emo porn back, but had trouble fully enjoying the good character bits, especially the ones with Sam and Dean actually interacting, because of lingering shakiness from (1)—perhaps it will be easier on rewatch. Still, Sam finally got his supernatural therapist! Yay!
That aside, and trying not to replicate too much of what I’ve seen elsewhere:
First, where is the fic explaining where Dean learned to use his “I-statements” to resolve conflicts? I’ll take anything: Dean reads Cosmo (about as many half-naked women in there as in the Victoria’s Secret catalog, after all) after he’s run out of Vonnegut. Or: Dean in high school is sent to the counselor after a fight. Later, he meets up with a guy who said some nasty things about the Winchesters, says “when you say those things, it makes me feel like I want to kick your ass,” and proceeds to do so, ultimately concluding that the I-statement just delayed the pleasant ass-kicking portion of the encounter.
Second, prophecy, hunh? A: I think it’s fascinating that Castiel said that what Chuck writes will come true, because we know that Castiel is wrong: Chuck didn’t write down the blood-drinking. So prophecy is not what Castiel thinks it is—Chuck isn’t God, but he has a kind of control, and that may be important, especially if he chooses (under duress) not to tell the Winchesters what he’s seen.
B: this issue of distortion by the prophet ties into the conception of creativity expressed. Unlike, say, Mulder in the XF episode that did this, the Winchesters don’t get to talk to the author (Author?). Or, when Dean does, he’s yelling up at the sky, and God isn’t listening, even if Castiel is. Chuck, the supposed author, doesn’t have much in the way of control over his characters. His control is exercised by not writing down everything that he knows. As
cesperanza said to me, another implication of this is that the apocrypha may be just as true. Chuck wrote down the version that he wanted to see, even though that was just one aspect of the Winchesters. The fanfic writers may write down what they see/sense happening to these characters, who exist outside of Chuck’s consciousness. This is part of why I found the episode very receptive to fan interpretations at a meta level, even as I didn’t want or need that direct an address.
Third,
cesperanza also pointed out that, despite her affect, the publisher’s questions were very much fanboy questions: numbers, song titles. Yes, we fangirls know these things—though I admit, like Sam, I forgot that we knew his LSAT (only 174, Sam? No wonder you picked Stanford [/supersnide])—but, seriously, fellow fangirls: are those the questions you’d ask? Maybe she was targeting her questions to presumed fanboys, though.
Fourth, okay, it was kind of a mess at the level of plot. But I like the idea of an archangel following Chuck around quite mechanically, ignoring everything else despite the threat Lilith poses. It fits into my preferred theories that the angels aren’t actually opposed to the apocalypse and that God is out of the game, leaving everything up for interpretation by humans, angels, and demons.
Other: Thanks to
hulamoth for the cool sunglasses!
Also, I'm sure you've all seen this, but Sequential Tart has an awesome interview with Catherine Tosenberger on the Epic Love Story of Sam and Dean. Has she blogged about 4x18 yet?
That aside, and trying not to replicate too much of what I’ve seen elsewhere:
First, where is the fic explaining where Dean learned to use his “I-statements” to resolve conflicts? I’ll take anything: Dean reads Cosmo (about as many half-naked women in there as in the Victoria’s Secret catalog, after all) after he’s run out of Vonnegut. Or: Dean in high school is sent to the counselor after a fight. Later, he meets up with a guy who said some nasty things about the Winchesters, says “when you say those things, it makes me feel like I want to kick your ass,” and proceeds to do so, ultimately concluding that the I-statement just delayed the pleasant ass-kicking portion of the encounter.
Second, prophecy, hunh? A: I think it’s fascinating that Castiel said that what Chuck writes will come true, because we know that Castiel is wrong: Chuck didn’t write down the blood-drinking. So prophecy is not what Castiel thinks it is—Chuck isn’t God, but he has a kind of control, and that may be important, especially if he chooses (under duress) not to tell the Winchesters what he’s seen.
B: this issue of distortion by the prophet ties into the conception of creativity expressed. Unlike, say, Mulder in the XF episode that did this, the Winchesters don’t get to talk to the author (Author?). Or, when Dean does, he’s yelling up at the sky, and God isn’t listening, even if Castiel is. Chuck, the supposed author, doesn’t have much in the way of control over his characters. His control is exercised by not writing down everything that he knows. As
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Third,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Fourth, okay, it was kind of a mess at the level of plot. But I like the idea of an archangel following Chuck around quite mechanically, ignoring everything else despite the threat Lilith poses. It fits into my preferred theories that the angels aren’t actually opposed to the apocalypse and that God is out of the game, leaving everything up for interpretation by humans, angels, and demons.
Other: Thanks to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Also, I'm sure you've all seen this, but Sequential Tart has an awesome interview with Catherine Tosenberger on the Epic Love Story of Sam and Dean. Has she blogged about 4x18 yet?
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
But I'm totally with you on the squicky discomfort of being freaking called out on the show, man. I totally squirmed! And squealed! And laughed too loud!
From:
no subject
I've been thinking about this since you said it on Friday, and I don't think it's quite true. Chuck didn't write down the blood-drinking, but while we didn't actually see the text, I don't think we're meant to infer that he replaced it with a scene where Sam nobly refused to drink Ruby's blood. Rather, he just left it out altogether. Which means that at best Chuck is a filter rather than a reviser.
Now, a selective truth can be very misleading, so that gives them a little room to play, but I think we are still left with an absolute known truth, and Castiel is right: if Chuck writes it down, it will happen. It's just that if he doesn't write it down, that doesn't mean it won't happen.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
They have pleasantly defied my expectations so far this season, though, so maybe I'll be wrong again.
From:
no subject
That is a very good point. *likes having smrt people on her flist*
Gay incest might make them less - sympathetic - too. *smirks*
re: the publisher's questions, (and you can stop gloating about your undoubtedly high LSAT scores, I'm not telling you what mine were, but they weren't 174, cf notes on why I'm in grad school not law school)
Those were serious fanboy questions, I didn't know the answers. I haven't memorized that kind of data about a show since I was 16 (yes, I still remember Fox Mulder's birthday(10-13-61), apt. number(42 hahaha), Scully's apt. number (402) etc.).
From:
no subject
If I didn't have nine zillion other things to write, I'd write this in a minute. I really wish someone would.
I knew all the answers aside from the tie for Dean's favorite songs. O__o
Does CT keep a blog? If so, can I get the link?
From:
no subject
I don't know if she does. I was just hoping.
From:
no subject