The NYT says:
So either FF.net has changed its policies, or once again the "pervy hobbit fancier" meme has taken over reality. ( I could do the whole "I do not think that word means what you think it means," but I doubt the NYT writer actually thinks that FF.net stories are pornographic; rather, the NYT writer likely has not read FF.net stories.) It's like saying "Mitt Romney's book appeared in a bookstore that also carries steamy romances!" except that the combination of fans + internet (+ crazy politics) precludes rational analysis. I'm not surprised the Romney campaign perceives this as an error, but I wish the NYT didn't propagate this nonsense.
Still, the Romney campaign had not expected its banners to appear on FanFiction.net,whose users have seen thousands of “Romney for President” ads while using the site to write their own plots about their favorite fictional characters — or read the work of others, including pornographic scenes between Harry Potter and Hermione Granger.
So either FF.net has changed its policies, or once again the "pervy hobbit fancier" meme has taken over reality. ( I could do the whole "I do not think that word means what you think it means," but I doubt the NYT writer actually thinks that FF.net stories are pornographic; rather, the NYT writer likely has not read FF.net stories.) It's like saying "Mitt Romney's book appeared in a bookstore that also carries steamy romances!" except that the combination of fans + internet (+ crazy politics) precludes rational analysis. I'm not surprised the Romney campaign perceives this as an error, but I wish the NYT didn't propagate this nonsense.
Tags:
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Mitt, is that you?? Mitt, please quit spamming my television. We already know we hate you, thanks to 4 years of governor action.
From:
no subject
The "problem" was that the campaign contracted with a network, which puts ads lots of places, including ff.net, so they didn't specifically target the place. I agree, the chance that the ads would win voting-age hearts and minds seems low. But then again, I've been reading a bunch of really disturbing ad research about how mere exposure makes you like something more, unless you're thinking hard about it; so all those ads we ignore can make the products or candidates seem more acceptable, at least if we don't have firm preexisting beliefs. So you never know.
From:
no subject
Mitt is spamming my TV on the off-chance that all the New Hampster resident who work in Massachusetts just never noticed how much we hate him, or are willing to vote for him just to spite us.
From:
no subject
It's like when I was first getting into anime, wanted to go to a convention, and The Sunday Times here in the UK had just published an article about how all anime was porn. It didn't make my parents keen to let me go, let's put it that way. (I was in my teens at the time.)
From:
no subject
Moving forward from that assumption, I suspect that even if the popular perception was that fandom spent their time writing non-sexually-explicit gen about Dimitri Karamazov and Anna Karenina (insert yr own personal bulletproof emblem of "high culture" here) rather than Harry/Hermione, we'd still see a belittling attitude from some. Oy. Their loss, I say! :)
From:
no subject
From:
no subject