I understand I'm alone in my conviction that contractions are perfectly appropriate in law review articles. But, just once, couldn't we make an exception?
Here is the "correction" at issue: "Just as you do not need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows, you do not need a scholar to know that multiple interpretations of a text exist."
Reassure me, LJ. I should fight for my right to Dylan homage, shouldn't I?
Here is the "correction" at issue: "Just as you do not need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows, you do not need a scholar to know that multiple interpretations of a text exist."
Reassure me, LJ. I should fight for my right to Dylan homage, shouldn't I?
Tags:
From:
no subject