I'm back! From outer space! Actually from the end of classes, but it's a lot like.

Laurell K. Hamilton, Micah: Bad, bad, bad. Not even entertainingly, guilty-pleasure bad (or in this case Incubus Dreams bad), but boringly and cheaply bad. Full of stupid rhetorical questions, repetition, and pointless descriptions of makeup; Hamilton seems to be getting paid by the word – padding out a story that was already too short to put into hardcover. There's a fascinating story to be told in Anita's change from uptight vampire slayer to polymorphously perverse necromancer, but instead of telling it, Hamilton has let her prose deteriorate like Anita's moral boundaries. Hard-boiled noir style has to be managed carefully to avoid caricature, and Hamilton isn't even trying.

In light of all that's wrong with this book, I shouldn't even be complaining about the ridiculous size-queen descriptions of Micah's enormous schlong and Anita's superwomanly ability to accommodate him where inferior lovers couldn't, but it's my review and I'll complain if I want to. I'll admit some sympathy about the sex scenes; they're difficult to write, and choice of words for girl parts is hardest because you have even fewer options, compared to the already sparse list of sexy words for boy parts, that won't immediately make your audience uncomfortable. But that doesn't excuse "... it was the kind of sore I didn't mind. The kind of sore that would be like a keepsake, that I could take out and look at and remember what we'd done. I'd remember the pleasure of it with every ache between my legs." Paid by the word, I tell you. At least I didn't pay for this book; I recommend that you also refrain from doing so. If Hamilton writes a better book after this (and judging by the excerpt from the next one, which includes some seriously nasty issues with other women, I'm thinking she won't), it will doubtless include an infodump to get you back up to speed.

Jonathan Kellerman, Twisted: Sentence fragments. Many. More annoying this time than I usually find them. Think that Petra Connor is not as natural a character for Kellerman than his stand-in Alex Delaware. There’s a young guy. Smart, has a crush on Petra. Discovers a serial killer’s pattern. The date of the next murder approaches as Petra works a concert slaying. Kellerman maybe ought to have stuck to damaged kids.

Lemony Snicket, The Penultimate Peril: I admit, as this series has gone on, I’ve gotten increasingly nervous. I was burned badly by the XF, and I’ve wondered how on Earth Snicket plans to resolve all his conspiracy plots. I still don’t know, but I’m hopeful. In this volume – possibly the next to last, though it’s never smart to rely on what series writers tell you midseries; it’s the writerly equivalent of “I’ll pull out, I promise” – some mysteries are cleared up, while others merely accumulate more clues. The setting is a hotel whose rooms are labeled and organized according to the Dewey Decimal System (there is really a hotel like this, though it got sued for trademark infringement), which is both quirky and disconcerting. Sunny continues to develop, though her speech remains limited. All three Baudelaires confront the trouble with conspiracy – how do you know you’re on the right side? – and struggle with their complicity in evil deeds, even if only by accident. There’s a surprising amount of power lurking in the storytelling here, from the ways in which the Baudelaires are brought to question their own goodness to the ominous mention of fire early on in the volume. I can’t wait to see what happens next.

Rachel Caine, Heat Stroke (book 2 of Weather Wardens): Joanne Baldwin, formerly a Weather Warden with the power to control the weather, lately died in action and was remade as a djinn, a creature of immense power but also immense vulnerability to being bound to service. As she tries to control her newfound powers and negotiate her relationship with the sexy djinn who made her, a strange new magic threatens djinn and, possibly, all existence. I found the romance far too tell-y for my taste – it was just hearing how sexy the guy was and how good the sex was, again and again – though perhaps it's just been too long since I read the first one.

Marjane Satrapi, Persepolis 2: The Story of a Return: Okay, so I skipped the first volume; I buy at book sales, what can I say? Satrapi’s story of misadventures in Germany as a teenager, leading to her return to half-repressive (a very scary half) Iran in the 1980s and a doomed first marriage, is engaging enough. The graphic novel format brings some freshness to otherwise standard insights about growing up, the desires of young people under repressive regimes, and the desires of young people under permissive regimes. “Wisdom reflects on the follies of youth” is the basic theme; Satrapi is fairly forgiving of her younger self and the other young people around her, though there are others, like a crazy landlady in Germany, she still finds contemptible.

John J. Miller, Wild Cards: Death Draws Five. George R.R. Martin’s name is the biggest thing on the cover (though the breasts of the major female character are some competition – it’s so much more cheesy than cheesecakey that I barely got offended), and the story features a number of characters he created in the 80s with his Wild Cards universe, which I loved before I knew about A Song of Ice and Fire. The story itself is not so great – a young ace comes into his powers and two religious sects (one a sort of Opus Dei, the other headed by a charismatic American ex-president) think that he’s the Antichrist or the Second Coming, respectively. Shenanigans ensue. The biggest problem is with the aforesaid female character, who’s supposed to be religiously uptight and demure but has apparently not noticed that she’s walking around in a skintight leather jumpsuit – which she takes off and puts on at intervals but never cleans, despite all the fights she gets into. Overall, not a great finish for a really enjoyable series. Maybe there’ll be more now that Martin’s relatively famous.

From: [identity profile] parkersstarbuck.livejournal.com


well i read laura k. hamiliton ... not the right stuff for me. AND i agree with you on kellerman

From: [identity profile] herewiss13.livejournal.com


I've got to ask, since you dislike Hamilton so much (this has to be the 3rd or 4th negative review in a row), why do you keep _reading_ her? ;-)

Myself, I don't mind it so much. But opinions do differ...and I'm probably not reading it as closely. ;-)

From: [identity profile] rivkat.livejournal.com


I have stopped reading the Merry Gentry books. And I doubt I'll buy Danse Macabre. But my ultimate verdict (http://rivkat.livejournal.com/69537.html) on Incubus Dreams wasn't that negative. I really liked Anita for a long time, and I hoped those crazy kids could work it out.

From: [identity profile] elynross.livejournal.com


With Hamilton, I'm feeling like I did with Piers Anthony's Xanth books. I still have the first four of those, and I will keep and reread the earlier Hamilton, but the last several books have gone increasingly downhill for me. She apparently deliberately stepped away from the troubles with Richard due to fans "bugging" her about it, and where they originally seemed to be decent plots with sex scattered around, now they seem sex with plot barely holding them together. I haven't yet read Micah, but the last book seemed all setup and excuses for Anita to literally have Yet More Guilt-Laden Sex with Men She'd Just Met because of the ardeur, and very little story advancement.

I just read the second Weather Warden book, as well, and it was enjoyable enough fluff, but not a strong book by any means, and yes, too much telling, I thought as well.

I'm sorry to hear that about the Wild Cards book. I've had an itch lately to go back and reread the originals, which I enjoyed very much.

May I ask what it is you enjoy particularly about the Lemony Snicket series? I read the first... three or four? I really wanted to enjoy them, but they lacked something for me, and were ultimately just unpleasant for me to read, where I'd been hoping to feel about them as I do about Edward Gorey or Charles Addams, darkness with charm and slyness. I've never quite understood how they come across to the people who really enjoy them.

From: [identity profile] rivkat.livejournal.com


That's a fascinating question, because I have the same problem with Douglas Adams. I feel like they present a world full of inexplicable menace -- as the world is always inexplicably menacing to children -- and outrageous happenings, both good and bad, that provide Snicket/Handler an opportunity for witty commentary while constantly reminding us that the children are sad and scared. I like his asides about what big or complicated words really mean, and I like how Sunny's word salad usually has some relevance if you get the reference. I guess I feel that, though Snicket-the-narrator is affected in a lot of ways, those ways work in service of the underlying humanity of the characters. I know I haven't explained it all that well, and I might be gravely disappointed by the end, but I really hope that the last book will reveal the mysteries and give the children some sort of resolution. It could even be pretty happy, given that Snicket's never going to forget that the children lost their parents horribly and nothing will ever make it all better.

From: [identity profile] elynross.livejournal.com


Well, it's always hard to try to explain what you get to someone who doesn't, isn't it? *g* And I'm always afraid I come off as aggressively asking people to defend their preferences, but I really was surprised not to care for the Snicket books, and very disappointed. I expect I'll read them all through at some point to see what they're like overall.

I find the comparison to Adams *fascinating*, though. I'd agree, thinking about it, that there's a sense of menace, but it always goes along with a cheerful sense that just as the "heroes" fall into trouble, they'll fall back out again, willy-nilly, seldom through any real plan or effort of their own, and even the trials are funny.

I suspect that my reaction to Snicket is simply that his style doesn't work for me, that what comes across as funny and witty to others somehow just seems arch and unrelentingly awful -- and that's probably the heart of it. Not just that nothing will ever make it all better, but that basically the universe will never allow anything good to last, and when it goes, it will all be worse than it ever was. As with Philip Pullman's Golden Compass and sequels, the underlying sense of the universe is so utterly alien to me, and so deeply, unalterably horrid that it flavors any enjoyment for me.

From: [identity profile] chase820.livejournal.com


Laurell K. officially lost me after the last Merry Gentry book. I just couldn't read one more interminable sex scene with the candy-colored stud of her choice.

It makes me sad, really, because the early Anita Blakes are really fun, tight little mysteries. And it was rather refreshing to find a heroine who wasn't actively trying to be likeable. Anita's degeneration into perpetual cat-in-heat is one of the saddest transformations since those bastards at 1013 turned Scully into the bloody Virgin Mary.

I've made a vow: no more paying for Laurell K. The library always has tons of copies, anyway. I think one of the local librarians is a big fan.

From: [identity profile] elynross.livejournal.com


I've already put Micah on hold at mine -- I think to read in horrified fascination of exactly this, the degeneration from actual mysteries to excuses for more sex.

Oddly, I actually still enjoy the Merry Gentry books, I think because they never were anything more than an excuse for unlimited sex scenes, since the major premise early on was that the heroine had to get pregnant. Somehow the fact that they've never really been anything other than what the Anita books have become means I am not as disappointed in them. *g*

From: [identity profile] chase820.livejournal.com


I loved the first two Merry G.'s, when there was a little plot to go along with all the shagging.

What I can't abide anymore is the sloooooowwwww progression of what little plot there is. Hasn't Merry been trying to get to that stupid ball for like, three books now?

The Merry G. story really should have been a fun, sexy trilogy. Turning them into a twelve-part epic just smacks of greed to me.

From: [identity profile] elynross.livejournal.com


It seems to me the plot has always been fairly minimal, although it seemed like more initially, with all the setup. But from the first book, Merry's been set up to shag her entourage as often as possible, so as I said, for me the books have always been about shagging in and around a little plot, as opposed to the Blake books, which originally had substantial plot in each book, and relatively minimal shagging, usually tied to the plot. So, I completely understand your frustration with slow plot development -- that's the point I've reached and passed with Anita -- it was just never really why I read the Gentry books, so for me, so far, they're fulfilling the purpose I read them for, which is fantasy-based relatively soft porn. I just can't enjoy the Blake books that way, because they used to be more, bah.

From: [identity profile] ter369.livejournal.com


For a little therapeutic satire post-Micah (thanks for taking one for the team, Rivka) I suggest this satire written after reading his debut appearance in the series.

Die, Micah, Die (http://www.phase-five.net/jcfash/html/dmd.html) as a title just says it all, yes?

From: [identity profile] zeldadestry.livejournal.com


I loved the first volume of Persepolis, especially the depiction of her relationship with her Grandmother. I'm sure there's a copy out there just waiting to cross yr path ;)

From: [identity profile] vivwiley.livejournal.com


Glad you survived...(sorry, couldn't resist)

To echo Ter - thanks for taking one for the team on "Michah" - I'd nearly picked it up a couple times but never actually gotten around to purchasing it. Will move right along....
oyceter: teruterubouzu default icon (Default)

From: [personal profile] oyceter


Seconding the love for Persepolis, which I ended up liking better than the sequel. It's not that the sequel is bad, it's just that I found the issues and the contrasts between child-Marjane and post-revolution Iran fascinating. Satrapi's narrative in the first one is wonderfully funny and unsentimental as well.

From: [identity profile] laceymcbain.livejournal.com

OT crack van


Just wanted to let you know I've rec'ced your "Five Things That Never Happened to Lex Luthor" for this month's [livejournal.com profile] crack_van. It's still one of my favourite 5 things pieces in any fandom - and the section with the zebra ... kills me dead. *g*

From: [identity profile] jonquil.livejournal.com


"The kind of sore that would be like a keepsake, that I could take out and look at and remember what we'd done. "

Am I the only one who reads this and thinks "uterine prolapse"?
.

Links

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags