![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Okay, I’m not that interested in debating the ethics of sleeping with a demon in a comatose body, because in the end I’m not sure it gives us much purchase on actual ethical problems. What I object to from last night is not the backstory, which on its own I could accept and would actually find quite interesting. What makes me furious is the retroactive discontinuity created with Lazarus Rising, which was also a version of Ruby I could accept and find interesting.
In Lazarus Rising, I can handwave Sam as in shock when Dean shows up, so that we don't see the five-minute hug that then occurs half an hour later. What I cannot do is accept that Sam would have the coherence to fake a random hookup at the same time as he’s reeling from Dean’s return, and even more I can't accept that Ruby would be able to hide her reaction to seeing Dean Winchester risen from the dead. Unless her game is longer than anyone else’s, we haven’t seen her able to hide reactions like that. Trying to reconcile the two episodes is what makes my head spin.
Lazarus Rising could have made plenty of sense if Ruby had possessed Sam’s one-night stand after she left. It would mean we couldn't get that version of fucked-up Sammy having sex we saw last night (though there are plenty of other flashbacks I could suggest that still got him naked), and it would mean Sam had to accept the serious ethical problems of Ruby possessing a person with an active soul. If they didn't want that, they shouldn't have had played the first scene with GC in Lazarus Rising the way they did, and once they did have that scene in canon they should have sucked it up and done something different with Sam/Ruby.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
catdancerz has suggested to me that maybe Ruby knew Dean was back through the demonic grapevine, which … okay, then her lack of reaction to Dean’s reappearance is merely evil and puzzling, not incomprehensible. That still leaves the problem of Sam; perhaps he’s just ashamed of being with Ruby, but I find Lazarus Rising indigestible in retrospect.
In itself, this was a strong episode. But you can't keep taking shortcuts to get the moment that's good now at the expense of overall characterization. Short-term returns lead to long-term losses, as I think we've seen on Wall Street.
On a separate note, when Sam talked about how Ruby reminded him of Dean, I was reminded very much of SV’s attempts to revitalize Clark/Lana by having Clark & Lana reenact all the key Clark/Lex moments of S1. Disavowing subtext: you’re doing it wrong.
In Lazarus Rising, I can handwave Sam as in shock when Dean shows up, so that we don't see the five-minute hug that then occurs half an hour later. What I cannot do is accept that Sam would have the coherence to fake a random hookup at the same time as he’s reeling from Dean’s return, and even more I can't accept that Ruby would be able to hide her reaction to seeing Dean Winchester risen from the dead. Unless her game is longer than anyone else’s, we haven’t seen her able to hide reactions like that. Trying to reconcile the two episodes is what makes my head spin.
Lazarus Rising could have made plenty of sense if Ruby had possessed Sam’s one-night stand after she left. It would mean we couldn't get that version of fucked-up Sammy having sex we saw last night (though there are plenty of other flashbacks I could suggest that still got him naked), and it would mean Sam had to accept the serious ethical problems of Ruby possessing a person with an active soul. If they didn't want that, they shouldn't have had played the first scene with GC in Lazarus Rising the way they did, and once they did have that scene in canon they should have sucked it up and done something different with Sam/Ruby.
catdancerz has suggested to me that maybe Ruby knew Dean was back through the demonic grapevine, which … okay, then her lack of reaction to Dean’s reappearance is merely evil and puzzling, not incomprehensible. That still leaves the problem of Sam; perhaps he’s just ashamed of being with Ruby, but I find Lazarus Rising indigestible in retrospect. In itself, this was a strong episode. But you can't keep taking shortcuts to get the moment that's good now at the expense of overall characterization. Short-term returns lead to long-term losses, as I think we've seen on Wall Street.
On a separate note, when Sam talked about how Ruby reminded him of Dean, I was reminded very much of SV’s attempts to revitalize Clark/Lana by having Clark & Lana reenact all the key Clark/Lex moments of S1. Disavowing subtext: you’re doing it wrong.
Tags:
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
Re: Ruby in "Lazurus Rising"
From:
Re: Ruby in Lazurus Rising
but that really makes Sam more screwed
in the head than I originally thought.
LIke many comments lately reflect
the series is really Dean centered this season
it seems. Sam is definitely more detached
since Dean came back.