![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Henry Jenkins, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide: By convergence, Jenkins doesn’t mean that we’ll all own one black box that gives us all our information. Rather, we will have many boxes, but we’ll often follow particular cultural objects on a sort of treasure hunt through those boxes – watch the TV show, go talk about it at Television Without Pity, make a vid on our computer, use text messaging to access special bonus content by phone. Media will be richer for those who want to engage with them, even as other members of the audience just watch the show. Jenkins looks at Survivor spoilers, American Idol fans, The Matrix across different media, Star Wars fan films, young Harry Potter fans, and remix/mashup culture as applied to politics, drawing related lessons from each example.
There’s a detailed, thoughtful review here, to which Jenkins responds on his blog. I enjoyed the book and found it to have an interesting relationship to Yochai Benkler’s Wealth of Networks -- Jenkins is all about the particular example and what it might lead us to imagine for future systems, whereas Benkler is all about high theory and systematic reasoning, so the combination gives you deduction and induction together, reasoning towards similar results. Jenkins comes off as something of a booster, since he deliberately chooses to emphasize the liberatory and participatory power of convergence between media creators and media audiences, even as he acknowledges that producers are desperately trying to monetize and manage fan experiences. There’s a reason that “user-generated content” is now a buzzword on the pages of the Wall Street Journal -- businesses (and I don’t exclude TWoP) want to profit from the voluntary work of engaged, dedicated fans. Jenkins takes the view that there’s nothing inherently wrong with that, and I see his point. I’ve bought TWoP merchandise and I pay LJ to let me be a fan. Yet there’s a fair amount of room between “inherently” and “in practice,” and I would have appreciated more explicit attention to ways that convergence can go wrong and right from the perspective of participatory democracy. There’s a hint of this discussion in the chapter on Star Wars fan films, much of which has appeared elsewhere, when Jenkins elaborates Lucasfilm’s happiness with (certain) fan films, mostly by men, as compared to its deep unease with fan fiction, mostly by women. Even as big media companies loosen some constraints on fan interaction, they still want us to “celebrate the story the way it is.” As theorist, Jenkins would probably agree that much depends on what the meaning of “is” is, but Fox and Lucasfilms and the like aren’t interested in theory.
There’s a detailed, thoughtful review here, to which Jenkins responds on his blog. I enjoyed the book and found it to have an interesting relationship to Yochai Benkler’s Wealth of Networks -- Jenkins is all about the particular example and what it might lead us to imagine for future systems, whereas Benkler is all about high theory and systematic reasoning, so the combination gives you deduction and induction together, reasoning towards similar results. Jenkins comes off as something of a booster, since he deliberately chooses to emphasize the liberatory and participatory power of convergence between media creators and media audiences, even as he acknowledges that producers are desperately trying to monetize and manage fan experiences. There’s a reason that “user-generated content” is now a buzzword on the pages of the Wall Street Journal -- businesses (and I don’t exclude TWoP) want to profit from the voluntary work of engaged, dedicated fans. Jenkins takes the view that there’s nothing inherently wrong with that, and I see his point. I’ve bought TWoP merchandise and I pay LJ to let me be a fan. Yet there’s a fair amount of room between “inherently” and “in practice,” and I would have appreciated more explicit attention to ways that convergence can go wrong and right from the perspective of participatory democracy. There’s a hint of this discussion in the chapter on Star Wars fan films, much of which has appeared elsewhere, when Jenkins elaborates Lucasfilm’s happiness with (certain) fan films, mostly by men, as compared to its deep unease with fan fiction, mostly by women. Even as big media companies loosen some constraints on fan interaction, they still want us to “celebrate the story the way it is.” As theorist, Jenkins would probably agree that much depends on what the meaning of “is” is, but Fox and Lucasfilms and the like aren’t interested in theory.
Tags:
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
my kneejerk reaction has been that i'm a bit concerned with the narrow, extremely positive view he has. yes, he acknowledges the issue of gender bias in the fan film section, yet never does he talk about vids at all. [i.e., he doesn't really practice what he preaches)
the other thing that struck me was the HP Potterwar example where he revels in the synergy of fans and media corporations yet the entire thing is predicated on the fan production clearly being 'innocent'...i keep on having flashbacks to the situation of the gay BDSM community in the 80s when being gay slowly starterd to become acceptable...as long as you looked like you lived in the burbs!
fans entering mainstream but only on the sufferance of TPTB, accepted and legal only as long as they are condoned by TPTB? not my idea of community...
should trhe test cases be the most extreme rather than the least offensive ones???
From:
no subject
I am conflicted about this, because I think we freaks on the edges need the "innocents" and the kids as bridges to our common humanity. We do share a common cause. But I'd rather present us as a spectrum than pretend that the kids are what it's all about, then spring the more "extreme" versions on non-fan people once they've accepted the kids. On the other hand, Jenkins has a reasonable argument that the kids really are the majority of the writers, see ff.net; they're just not the majority of the experienced writers.
From:
no subject
I think I'd be happier with the presentation of a spectrum, although I can see why that's not what Jenkins has done.
From:
no subject
Yes. Oh yes.
Yet there’s a fair amount of room between “inherently” and “in practice,”
Too right. I for one *really* don't want to see the fannish version of astroturfing, for instance.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject