I read an article today that included a reference to another law review article which argued that it's good that Superman is the intellectual property of a single corporation motivated to keep his image pristine, because otherwise there would be a lot of pornography featuring Superman.
...
Uh... right. Whatever they say. Definitely pristine.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-08-09 07:08 am (UTC)...
Uh... right. Whatever they say. Definitely pristine.