Date: 2007-08-03 10:09 pm (UTC)
Good point. :) But I think my point still stands -- Ponderosa et al. are being attacked for the *content* of their art, which is presumed to be illegal/obscene; in none of the official communications has there been *any* mention of "this needs to be impossible for minors to ACCESS," it's all "OMG you're DEPICTING minors." In which case, then yes, the existence of LG is extremely pertinent.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

.

Links

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags