Good point. :) But I think my point still stands -- Ponderosa et al. are being attacked for the *content* of their art, which is presumed to be illegal/obscene; in none of the official communications has there been *any* mention of "this needs to be impossible for minors to ACCESS," it's all "OMG you're DEPICTING minors." In which case, then yes, the existence of LG is extremely pertinent.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 10:09 pm (UTC)