Good point. :) But I think my point still stands -- Ponderosa et al. are being attacked for the *content* of their art, which is presumed to be illegal/obscene; in none of the official communications has there been *any* mention of "this needs to be impossible for minors to ACCESS," it's all "OMG you're DEPICTING minors." In which case, then yes, the existence of LG is extremely pertinent.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-03 10:09 pm (UTC)