rivkat: Rivkid shakes tiny fist (shakes tiny fist)
([personal profile] rivkat Sep. 1st, 2010 12:54 pm)
I have already been making a feed available for Twitter as rivkat_lj because some people asked, but that’s a feed of my entries only; I do the same for my pro blog; I don't get why people want notification of long blog entries via Twitter when RSS is available, but I also don't want to make it difficult for anyone who wants to read my stuff to do so.  I'm actually trying the LJ implementation because in my experience twitterfeed, which I've been using, misses about one post in five. 

I will never crosspost comments anywhere, and I don’t really get why you would in most cases, since my mental image of comments is things that participate in a particular conversation. But then I think that about a lot of tweets too. This latest LJ trick obviously increases various risks, though I think it increases them in direct proportion to the similarity of your LJ name to your Facebook name.  As far as I’m aware, anything crossposted to Facebook will show up there as “comment on rivkat’s post” and not as “comment on legal name’s post,” so even if you have overlapping friend sets (as I do, a bit) it won’t be obvious to someone looking at your Facebook page that the two are the same. If I am wrong I will be very perturbed.  Obviously it would make me sad if someone crossposted comments to one of my very few locked posts, and I could seriously do without the changes in the comment form.  I installed the greasemonkey script and it seems to work, but my guess is that it will break eventually.

ETA: Okay, this just got bad.  I got a pingback to an entry to which I don't have access.  I don't like having talk behind my back shoved in my face, and I think it's silly to have pingbacks in those circumstances along with being invasive of the journaler's privacy.  But that's not the bad part.  The bad part is that a big chunk of the access-controlled entry was contained in the pingback.  Which, if I unscreened it, would be visible to everyone (since the post at issue is public).  Not on, LJ.  Not on.  Has anyone else seen this?  I thought the pingbacks only had post titles.

I have DW invites if anyone wants.

In other news: For some reason the button on my library access authentication page that says SUBMIT reads as very sexual to me. Possibly I’m just strange.

Eureka! This show is just much better than it has any right to be. How much must the writers have loved giving James Callis (1) hallucinations and (2) a male ex? It was like a perfect storm of crossreferences and subtext. But is he still stuck with his hallucination, since he hasn’t dealt with it? Also I now ship Carter/Jo. Or Allison/Carter/Jo, or Carter/Jo/Zane. Or, hell, some happy foursome, though I tend to think that Allison and Zane would not ever hook up in that combo.

giandujakiss: (Default)

From: [personal profile] giandujakiss


Okay, this just got bad. I got a pingback to an entry to which I don't have access. I don't like having talk behind my back shoved in my face, and I think it's silly to have pingbacks in those circumstances along with being invasive of the journaler's privacy. But that's not the bad part. The bad part is that a big chunk of the access-controlled entry was contained in the pingback. Which, if I unscreened it, would be visible to everyone (since the post at issue is public). Not on, LJ. Not on. Has anyone else seen this? I thought the pingbacks only had post titles.

Seriously?? Seriously? Yes, I knew that pingbacks had full posts but I thought they didn't operate for FLocked entries - I remember that was a concern when LJ first rolled out the feature and I thought it was all okay.
brownbetty: (Default)

From: [personal profile] brownbetty


I just got a pingback from an entry which is locked to me as well, which, happily for me, includes enough context to know exactly in what context I was being discussed, and it's neutral to mildly positive, so I shan't have blithering insecurities, but really. Definitely makes a strong argument for using redirects when posting wanky stuff under flock.
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

From: [personal profile] cofax7


Oh, CRAP.

So glad I'm no longer a paid LJ member, so I won't get pingbacks from posts dissing me. I do not have the kind of kevlar skin to deal with that.

I'll be boosting this, if you don't mind: people should know.
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

From: [personal profile] cofax7

Update! Breaking news!


I'm no longer a paying member of LJ, but I am still getting pingbacks, and YES they include pings from locked posts. (Why someone has locked their RECS post is beyond me, but whatever.)
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

From: [personal profile] cofax7

Re: Update! Breaking news!


It was a public post at one point, since locked, which apparently is the problem.

And thanks for the idea to post at news.
ilyena_sylph: picture of Labyrinth!faerie with 'careful, i bite' as text (Default)

From: [personal profile] ilyena_sylph


Thanks for the heads up. So damned glad I quit LJ a while ago, but I'm gonna pass the word on to some people.
yvi: (Dreamwidth - Badass Dreamwidth dev)

From: [personal profile] yvi


Is there any chance that the post linking to you was posted publicly at first?
sid: (Dreamwidth indigo)

From: [personal profile] sid


I just found out that was the case with the 2 pingbacks I received today on recced stories. The rec posts were public for NEARLY THREE YEARS, until the LJ owner decided to f-lock her journal today, due to all the new privacy issues. :-D

But I would like to thank the pingbot for transporting me back to 2007. Srsly. It was a trip. A head-scratching, time-wasting trip.
ursamajor: people on the beach watching the ocean (Default)

From: [personal profile] ursamajor


This was what happened in my case as well.

The irony? The newly-locked post in question was one explaining to people how to back up their LJs and not to panic and/or overreact, just be prepared. It was from the day SUP laid off half the US-based LJ staff. It had been public for a year and a half, but I'd decided to flock everything until I could figure out if the LJ comments situation was salvageable or not.
sid: (Dreamwidth indigo)

From: [personal profile] sid


Definitely a lot of ironic things happening!

From: [personal profile] faithofone


[personal profile] hsapiens linked me here when I asked for info about the pingback issue.

I've got pingbacks turned off, but I posted a locked entry about the crossposting & pingback issues, so if you get a pingback from that, I apologize for having a locked entry waved in your face.

From: [personal profile] faithofone


I'd be curious as heck too if I knew people were talking about me. Which is why I kind of have a rule in RL that if someone's talking about me, just don't tell me. I'd rather be blissfully ignorant of it than having the idea that it's going on eat me alive.

Good to know that it appears to only be an issue with posts that were created public to start with, at least that saves me the headache. But it's rather frightening that it is happening at all.
waldorph: (Default)

From: [personal profile] waldorph


Hope you don't mind: I got linked over here and I'll be linking people to your post.
amalthia: (Default)

From: [personal profile] amalthia


How do you check pingbacks? Do they just show up in our LJ inbox? or is an email notification sent? I don't know much about the topic to be honest.
amalthia: (Default)

From: [personal profile] amalthia


so that's how they work...that's kind of weird. I'm debating what to do. I rarely post flocked stuff so I'm not sure if the twitter/FB thing bugs me beyond the principle of the thing. I also rarely talk about other people so I'm not sure if the pingback would cause trouble either. I'm just baffled as to why they are not implementing cut tags that unfold like DW instead of this????
amalthia: (Default)

From: [personal profile] amalthia


Yes, I agree with this too. I think LJ has a serious problem with how they roll out new features. This should have been something you have to opt-in to use. Not opt-out. Plus the privacy issues...are problematic if it's pinging briefly unlocked posts.

I also track my name as much as possible to help in my efforts to promote the Ebook Library.

Now the twitter/facebook thing...do they even know their user base? I'm not sure how it's beneficial to them or the users? (non-withstanding the current outstanding issues with how it's implemented)
bliumchik: (Default)

From: [personal profile] bliumchik


Ah, LJ. Implementing ill-advised features without bothering to envisage worst-case scenarios since....


(PS I'm available to beta if you still need one.)
jenrose: (headdesk)

From: [personal profile] jenrose


I just turned off commments in crossposted entries, with the link back to Dreamwidth. Yeah, I'll read LJ. Yeah, I'll crosspost there. But privacy? Is important to me. It's why I like LJ-style journaling. LiveJournal? Can BITE MY SHINY WHITE ASS.
.

Links

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags